Introduction
Damages can happen on several occasions. And when such things happen, you need a complainant to prove in court that the defendant committed an unlawful act. Besides, the complainant must also show that the unlawful act that was carried out also caused some economic damages to make your victory more evident. Furthermore, your complainant has to do this to allow a kind of link to prove the correlation between the defendant’s character and the economic detriment that happened. While the complainant is doing this, the California damage expert witness also has to play his/her role.
The role of a California damage expert
While the complainant role is to make known the fact that causation is clear, what the California damage expert does in quantifying the damage that was caused cannot be really understood. As in some cases, the California damage expert can be instructed to adopt that there is a link between the damage and the liability issues. This happens so many times. For instance, in cases such as wrongful death and personal injury, where claims have been filed for damages flow from an injury and the damage expert in not expected to provide any evidence concerning the causation.
But in dissimilarity, other issues arise, and the damage expert has a lot to do directly with the discourse on causation. For instance, most times, the accounting experts are reserved in some matters that involve accounting cases like a professional liability. And they have to provide a proof that relates to the financial harm and liability.
The role of the damage expert witness
A case trial starts with the presentation of an opening statement which structures the case for the judges. Nonetheless, it does not mean that the opening statement serves as a proof and the jurors are expected to take the statement as the view of the party. It should have no influence on the judgment to be passed. In a case of damages, the damage expert witness is introduced after the opening statement.
A damage expert witness is needed when it is necessary that you provide a proof which is reasonable and has to surpass the common ideas. The reason for this is that in case the regular juror understands the given proof in relation to the case on ground, opinions from any other person is not required. And in a case where the judge is being educated on the evidence that was given and he/she can give a right answer to the question, the judge will be required to answer to as to give a verdict. Then you should make use of a damage expert witness.
In addition, a damage expert witness is qualified by his/her skill, knowledge, education, training and experience.
Conclusion
Maybe you are involved in a damage case in California. You should seek a California damage expert. And if need be you should also get a damage expert witness. And if you do not know what they do, we have discussed their roles in this article. Take time and go through it. Good Luck!
